Activity tracking

Context for review, not a productivity score

Activity tracking in SIPAG gives managers a general sense of engagement during tracked time — it is not a score, a ranking, or a substitute for judging the actual quality of the work.

Activity Summary

Today
7h 24m
Tracked

6

Sessions

2

Projects
Design task
Reviewed
Client call
Logged
Admin
Logged

Setting expectations

What activity tracking means; and what it doesn't

Being explicit about this is part of how SIPAG is designed, not just how it’s described.

What it means

What it doesn't mean

Technical detail

What's actually measured

Signal

Detail

Input activity

Application context

Retention

Deletion on account closure

SIPAG records that keyboard and mouse input occurred during a tracked interval — it does not log which keys were pressed or capture typed content.

The name of the active application is recorded to support task attribution (e.g. “design tool,” “spreadsheet”); specific window titles and URLs are not captured by default.

Activity summaries are retained for the length of the client relationship plus twelve months, then deleted, unless a longer period is required to resolve an open dispute.

Activity data tied to a closed account is deleted within ninety days, except where retained as part of an unresolved PayStaff Protect case.

Responsible use

How managers should — and shouldn't — use it

Activity data is most useful as a conversation starter, not a verdict. A quiet afternoon might mean deep, uninterrupted focus on a hard problem, or it might mean something else entirely — the data alone doesn't say which. It's there to support a real review, not replace one.

PayStaff's own guidance to clients is straightforward: use activity tracking to inform a conversation about work, never as the sole basis for a decision about someone's performance or pay.

Want to see how this looks in practice?

We'll show you activity tracking the way your team would actually see it.